Evidence Hub

Results of the lung and colorectal cancer screening study in China: a feasibility, randomised controlled trial

Jiang Li, P. Hu, Ju-Fang Shi, Martina Taylor, Ni Li, Jiansong Ren, Hong-Da Chen, Xian-Zhen Liao et al.

The Lancet, 2019

777 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background China has not yet developed national guidelines for lung and colorectal cancer screening, and needs scientific evidence from the Chinese population for making policy. The aim of this study was to obtain compliance information to design a large-scale randomised lung and colorectal cancer screening trial in China. Methods This multicentre, open label, pilot randomised trial was done at 33 community health-care centres and three hospitals in Haining (Zhejiang province), Changsha (Hunan province), and Lanzhou (Gansu province). Eligibility criteria included participants aged between 50 and 74 years, current smokers with a history of at least 30 pack-years, and passive smokers. Exclusion criteria included participation in another trial, history of lung or colorectal cancer, or evidence of previous cancer treatment. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1:1) using a predefined web-based system to: group 1, annual low-dose CT (LDCT) plus a baseline colonoscopy; group 2, biannual LDCT plus annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT); and group 3, annual fecal FIT plus septin-9 blood test. The primary outcomes of the study included the annual compliance and incidence of lung and colorectum cancer. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR-IOR-15007160. Findings Between Aug 12, 2014, and June 30, 2017, 2696 participants were randomly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 777 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free