Evidence Hub

Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Health-Related Social Needs among Youth in a Largely Rural Health System

Catherine P Benziger, Brandon J Schultz, Melissa L Harry, Clayton I. Allen, Laura A. Freitag, S. Asche, Heidi L Ekstrom, Inih J. Essien et al.

Academic pediatrics, 2026

33,192 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and health-related social needs (HRSN) among youth 6-17 years receiving care in a primarily rural health system.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of patients 6-17 years who were eligible for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial. Patients with a blood pressure (BP) measurement at a primary care visit between 8/1/2022-7/31/2023 were included. Primary measures were CVD risk factors, identified through diagnoses, problem lists and clinical data, and the presence of one or more HRSN as reported in a validated questionnaire. Contingency tables and logistic regression analyses were used to quantify associations between CVD risk factors and HRSN.

RESULTS

A total of 33,192 patients (mean 11.6 years, 49.6% male, 55.3% rural) were included. Smoking, obesity, and BP were routinely assessed while diabetes and dyslipidemia were evaluated in a subset. Thirty-five percent had at least one CVD risk factor. Obesity (21.0%) and smoking or passive smoke exposure (16.8%) occurred frequently while diabetes or prediabetes (3.0%) and hypertension or hypertensive level blood pressure (2.3%) were infrequent. Financial strain (4.0%), food worry (3.3%), and food insecurity (2.4%) were the most often reported HRSN. Having a HRSN was associated with CVD risk factors including smoking (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.25-2.99), diabetes or prediabetes (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 33,192 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free