Evidence Hub

Mediation analysis investigating the mechanisms of two school-based smoking prevention interventions in adolescents from Northern Ireland and Bogotá

J. Murray, Sharon C. Sánchez-Franco, Olga L. Sarmiento, Erik O. Kimbrough, Christopher Tate, Shannon C. Montgomery, Rajnish Kumar, Laura Dunne et al.

Frontiers in Public Health, 2026

1,344 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background Reviews have highlighted a lack of evidence on how successful intervention strategies for adolescent smoking prevention can be effectively adapted for low-middle income countries (LMICs). The MECHANISMS study compared behavioral mechanisms between two school-based smoking prevention programs for adolescents in Northern Ireland (NI; a high-income setting) and Bogotá, Colombia (middle-income). ASSIST works via peer education and diffusion. Dead Cool uses conventional classroom pedagogy. Both interventions were previously trialed in the UK and were culturally adapted for Bogotá. We investigated whether changes in smoking/vaping outcomes differed by intervention or setting. Mediation analyses were conducted to test the hypothesized intervention mechanisms. Methods Full school year groups in 12 secondary schools participated during one semester (n = 1,344, target age 12–13 years). Outcomes included willingness to pay (WTP) to support anti-smoking norms, self-report and objectively measured smoking behavior, smoking intentions, susceptibility, knowledge, and attitudes. Mediators included injunctive and descriptive smoking/vaping norms, self-efficacy to resist tobacco, perceived risks and benefits, perceived behavioral control, and exposure to advertising. Structural equation models examined intervention and setting effects on outcomes. Multiple mediator models were conducted using the product-of-coefficients approach. Results Most significant intervention effects showed…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free