Evidence Hub

Cardiovascular health effects of vaping e-cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A. Kundu, Anna Feore, Sherald Sanchez, Nada Abu-Zarour, Megan Sutton, Kyran Sachdeva, Siddharth Seth, Robert Schwartz et al.

Heart, 2025

30 citations

Abstract

Background There is substantial interest in the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarette use, highlighting the need to update our knowledge on the subject. We conducted this review to analyse whether e-cigarette use increases cardiovascular health risks and how these risks vary among different populations. Methods We searched six databases and included peer-reviewed human, animal, cell/in vitro original studies but excluded qualitative studies, which were published between July 2021 and December 2023. Three types of e-cigarette exposure were examined: acute, short-to-medium term and long term. Different risk of bias tools were used for assessing the quality of the included human studies and we conducted meta-analysis when possible. Results We included 63 studies in the main analysis, 12 studies in the meta-analysis and 32 studies in the sociodemographic factor-based subgroup analysis. Over half of the human studies had low risk of bias. Acute exposure to e-cigarette was associated with increased heart rate (HR) (mean difference (MD) 11.329, p<0.01) and blood pressure (BP) (MD 12.856, p<0.01 for systolic; MD 7.676, p<0.01 for diastolic) compared with non-use. While HR was lower after acute exposure to e-cigarettes compared with cigarettes (MD −5.415, p<0.01), no significant difference in systolic or diastolic BP was observed. Non-smoker current vapers had no significant differences in resting HR and BP compared with non-users but lower resting HR (MD −2.608, p<0.01) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free