Evidence Hub

Air pollution exposure and prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and related cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xing-Yi He, Shi-Peng Zhang, Qinglin Bai, Moshen Pan, Yan-Jie Jiang, Weiwei Liu, Wei Li, Yuan-Yuan Gong et al.

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2024

4,347,541 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis were used to investigate the relationship between air pollution exposure and the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its related cirrhosis. Through this study, we hope to clarify the potential public health risks of air pollution as an environmental exposure factor.

METHODS

Through a comprehensive and systematic search of the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases, studies published up to March 30, 2024, that met the eligibility criteria were identified. The meta-analysis aimed to determine the association between air pollution exposure and NAFLD risk. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on regional economic development after adjusting for confounding factors. The combined odds ratio (OR) was calculated, publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, and consideration was given to heterogeneity among study-specific relative risks.

RESULTS

This review included 14 observational studies (including 7 cohort studies and 7 cross-sectional studies) involving 43,475,41 participants. The pooled analysis showed that PM2.5, NOx, PM10, PM2.5-10, passive smoking, PM1, and air pollution from solid fuels were positively associated with the incidence and prevalence of NAFLD and its related cirrhosis. The risk ratios for PM2.5, NOx, PM10, PM2.5-10, passive smoking, and air pollution from solid fuels for NAFLD and its related cirrhosis were 1.33 (95 % CI: 1.25, 1.42), 1.19 (95…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,347,541 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free