Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis of lifestyle and reproductive factors associated with risk of breast cancer in Asian women

B. H. Ang, S. Teo, W. Ho

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 2024

13 citations

Abstract

Introduction Assessing breast cancer risks from lifestyle and reproductive factors is critical for developing population-specific risk prediction tools. However, limited studies have evaluated these risks in recent Asian birth cohorts. Methods We systematically reviewed articles published from January 2010 to December 2023, examining breast cancer risk factors in Asian women. Data were described narratively, estimates pooled, and prevalence and attributable proportions compared across Asian populations. Results Of the 128 studies reviewed, 103 reported adjusted effect sizes for meta-analysis. Lifestyle and reproductive factors were predictive of breast cancer risk in Asian women, with varying impacts on pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. Relative risks were similar within Asian populations and in comparison to European populations, except for menarche, menopause, and hormone receptor therapy. However, risk factor distributions differed across populations. Whilst alcohol intake (21%) and oral contraceptive use (20%) emerged as the most attributable modifiable risk factors in Europeans, passive smoking (24%) and higher BMI (17%,≥24kg/m2 among post-menopausal women) were predominant in Asians. Conclusion Our study shows that whilst the effects of lifestyle and reproductive breast cancer risk factors are largely similar across different populations, their distributions vary. Impact Our analysis underscores the importance of considering population-specific risk factor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free