Evidence Hub

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Clinical Outcomes in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of Emerging Evidence

Hatem Ahmed, Motaz Almahmood, A. Short, Sameh Gomaa, Khloud Abdelrazeq, Aamir Shahzad, A. Alharethi, Khaled Elsokary et al.

Cureus, 2026

1,869 participants

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs), including e-cigarettes and vaping, are increasingly used by adults with inflammatory bowel disease, often during smoking cessation or transition from combustible cigarettes, yet their clinical implications remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception through December 18, 2025, together with grey literature sources; the search was rerun on April 24, 2026, identifying no additional eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data, and risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate tools. Four observational studies involving 1,869 participants, of whom 178 were ENDS users, met inclusion criteria. In nonoperative settings, a matched case-control study found no association between current e-cigarette use and a composite outcome of biologic initiation or change, hospitalization, or surgery; smaller cohorts were imprecise. In postoperative Crohn’s disease, endoscopic recurrence at one year was higher among exclusive e-cigarette users than among nonsmokers, with a directionally elevated but statistically nonsignificant adjusted estimate and higher biochemical activity also observed. Available evidence does not demonstrate a consistent association between current ENDS use and major inflammatory bowel disease outcomes in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,869 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free