Evidence Hub

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation

N. Lindson, J. Livingstone-Banks, A. Butler, H. McRobbie, Christopher R. Bullen, P. Hajek, Angela Difeng Wu, R. Begh et al.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2026

29,861 participants

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Electronic cigarettes (EC) are handheld electronic vaping devices that produce an aerosol by heating a liquid. People who smoke, healthcare providers, and regulators want to know if EC can help people quit smoking, and if they are safe to use for this purpose. This update was conducted as part of a living systematic review. Objectives To examine the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of EC for helping people who smoke tobacco achieve long‐term smoking abstinence, in comparison to non‐nicotine EC, other smoking cessation treatments, and no treatment. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO to 1 January 2026, reference‐checked, and contacted study authors. Eligibility criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) randomising people who smoked to an EC or control condition. Studies had to measure an eligible outcome. Outcomes Critical outcomes were abstinence from smoking after at least six months, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Important outcomes were biomarkers, toxicants/carcinogens, long‐term study product use and long‐term patterns of EC and combustible cigarette use. Risk of bias We used the RoB 1 tool to assess risk of bias for each study and GRADE to assess evidence certainty. Synthesis methods We followed standard Cochrane methods for screening and data extraction. Where appropriate, we pooled data using random‐effects models to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 29,861 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free