Evidence Hub

Item-level reanalysis of DASH outcomes after flexor tendon repair using Svensson’s non-parametric method

A. Dahlgren, Sara Chevalley, J. Strömberg, A. Björkman

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2026

Abstract

Objectives To examine longitudinal item-level changes in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire after flexor tendon repair and to compare outcomes between passive mobilisation with place-and-hold exercises and true active mobilisation. Design Randomised controlled trial with follow-ups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Subjects/patients Sixty-four patients were randomised before rehabilitation; 54 completed follow-up. Methods DASH responses were reanalysed using Svensson’s non-parametric rank-based method to evaluate systematic group-level changes and individual variability at the item level. Results Symptom items showed the greatest deterioration relative to baseline, with 37–69% of patients reporting persistent impairment at 12 months. Patients most often rated symptom items as ‘mild’ and ‘moderate’. All symptom items and three of four social functioning items demonstrated significant changes at each follow-up, whereas only 8 of 21 activity items were consistently significant. No statistically significant differences were observed between treatment groups. Conclusion One year after flexor tendon repair, patients continued to report difficulties, particularly with symptoms (stiffness, weakness, pain) and social interaction, while activity limitations were less prominent. These challenges were consistent across the cohort and did not differ between mobilisation protocols. Item-level analysis provided insights beyond total DASH scores,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free