Evidence Hub

Accurate verification of nicotine and tobacco product use or abstinence using a multi-biomarker approach

A. Sajid, Nikola Pluym, Therese Burkhardt, Jonathan Belsey, I. John, Riccardo Polosa, Max Scherer

Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment, 2026

180 participants

Abstract

Cigarette smokers are exposed to over 7,000 chemicals, including many toxic and carcinogenic agents. Alternative non-combustible nicotine products considerably reduce exposure to harmful constituents. Extensive research on biomarkers of potential harm is crucial for assessing the early health impacts of smoking and the reduction of harm after quitting or switching to alternative products. However, such clinical trials are constrained by poor verification of self-reported product use, as common procedures using exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and cotinine strip tests are limited by short detection periods and non-specificity, respectively. Therefore, product-use-specific biomarkers of exposure (BoEs) are needed for accurate biochemical verification in studies evaluating the health impact of new products, such as electronic cigarettes. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 180 participants, including current, former, and never-smokers, and applied several BoEs to verify their use behavior. Our multi-biomarker approach monitored exposure to nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, acrylonitrile and propylene glycol (PG), which were significantly elevated in the current smoker group except PG, identifying six non-compliant subjects (4 current, 1 former and 1 never-smoker). The proposed biomarker panel outperformed eCO and was able to distinguish distinct use patterns, such as vaping vs. smoking, thereby enhancing data accuracy. Moreover, biochemically determined exposure…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 180 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free