Evidence Hub

E-cigarette puff topography instruction to enhance switching among COPD patients who smoke

E. Leavens, Theodore L. Wagener, Leah M. Lambart, M. S. Mayo, Lexie Brown, Edward F. Ellerbeck, Sandra A. Billinger, Branden Comfort et al.

Frontiers in Public Health, 2025

46 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke often face significant challenges when attempting to quit. However, switching to less harmful alternatives such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may help mitigate tobacco-related health outcomes. Training COPD patients who smoke to adjust their puffing topography could enhance nicotine delivery and satisfaction, thereby facilitating their transition to less harmful alternatives. This pilot study examined a novel puffing topography feedback intervention to facilitate switching to e-cigarettes among COPD patients. Methods The study participants (N = 46) completed a 12-week e-cigarette switching trial in which they were randomized (1, 1:1) to (1) brief advice, (2) low-intensity, or (3) high-intensity topography training. This approach differed in the extent to which participants took longer puffs to maximize nicotine delivery, alleviate craving and withdrawal symptoms, and facilitate switching. Lab-based vaping sessions were conducted at weeks 0 (visits 1 and 2; separated by 48 h) and 12 (visit 3) to assess changes in puff duration (primary outcome), craving, withdrawal symptoms, and nicotine delivery. Effect size estimates are presented. Results Puff duration was similar across conditions at baseline (range: 1.14–1.70s), and contrary to the hypotheses, neither low- nor high-intensity training led to meaningful changes in puff duration over time compared to brief advice (Hedge’s g…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free