Comparison of the Vessel Loop Technique Versus Traditional Skin Closure for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection Following Laparotomy in General Surgery
Abstract
Background Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a common and costly complication following laparotomy. Passive subcutaneous drainage using vessel loops has been proposed as a simple method to reduce incisional SSI, but evidence in laparotomy patients is limited. This study aimed to compare the incidence of incisional SSI between vessel loop-assisted skin closure and conventional skin closure following laparotomy in general surgery patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients undergoing laparotomy for general surgical indications between January 2020 and January 2025. Patients were grouped according to skin closure technique: vessel loop-assisted closure (Vessiloop) or conventional closure without vessel loops. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of SSI in laparotomy patients who had vessel loop insertion compared to conventional laparotomy closure. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the association between patient comorbidities, surgical type, and the risk of SSI. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 70 patients were included: 35 in the Vessiloop group and 35 in the conventional closure group. Patients in the conventional closure group were older, had a higher ASA score, and had an increased rate of gastrointestinal disease. Overall, six patients (8.6%) developed SSI. No SSIs occurred in the Vessiloop group,…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 70 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Tobacco and COPD: presenting the World Health Organization (WHO) Tobacco Knowledge Summary
- Comparative effects of e-cigarette smoking on periodontal status, salivary pH, and cotinine levels
- Association between exposure to environmental pollutants and increased oral health risks, a comprehensive review
- Influence of gestational window on offspring vascular health in rodents with in utero exposure to electronic cigarettes
- Natural products as kinase inhibitors in lung cancer: molecular mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and clinical trials
- Nicotine in electronic cigarettes
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.