Evidence Hub

Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Berun A. Abdalla, Zuhair D. Hammood, Diyar Jaafar Hama Rashid, Las L. Hussain, S. J. Hasan, Abdullah D. Ahmad, Sasan M. Ahmed, S. T. Latif et al.

Judi Clinical Journal, 2026

100,000 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease that mimics carcinoma. GM can coexist with breast cancer (BC), though the relationship remains unclear. This systematic review aims to examine the coexistence of GM and BC, focusing on the clinicopathological features of synchronous and metachronous cases.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar, up to the 30th November 2025, identified studies reporting individual patient-level data. Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients diagnosed with both BC and GM (concurrently or sequentially); (2) histopathological or imaging confirmation of both conditions. Exclusion criteria were: (1) animal studies; (2) conference abstracts; (3) non-recommended journal publications; and (4) non-English papers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize categorical variables as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables as means or medians with ranges.

Results: Nineteen studies (23 female patients; median age of 42 years) were included. Most of the cases were premenopausal 17 (74.0%). Synchronous coexistence occurred in 15 (65.2%), with ipsilateral involvement in 11 (73.3%) of these. Granulomatous mastitis preceded BC in 6 (26.1%) (median interval 3 years), and BC preceded GM in 2 (8.7%). Core needle biopsy diagnosed GM in 9 (39.1%) and BC in 14 (60.9%); excisional biopsy was required in 7 (30.4%) of GM cases. Breast cancer treatment included mastectomy in 11 (47.8%) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 100,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free