Evidence Hub

Potential for primary prevention of low birth weight in pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study in Central China

Yu-Hang Wu, Han-Yu Xiao, Li-Zhang Chen, Jia-Bi Qin, Ting-Ting Wang

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2026

34,031 participants

Abstract

Low birth weight (LBW) remains a critical global health challenge, yet the differential contributions of risk factors in pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are poorly characterized. This study aimed to identify modifiable first-trimester risk factors for LBW in GDM and non-GDM subpopulations within a Chinese context, and quantify the preventable LBW burden by population attributable fraction (PAF) estimation adjusted for risk factor interdependence. This prospective cohort study enrolled 34,031 pregnant women from Central China (2013–2019), stratified by GDM (n = 5414) and non-GDM (n = 28,617) groups. Early-pregnancy exposures included advanced maternal age, passive smoking, alcohol intake, no folic acid used, low education, and pre-pregnancy underweight. Multivariable logistic regression and principal component analysis-adjusted PAFs were used to quantify preventable LBW burdens while accounting for risk factor overlap. Five risk factors were identified in both GDM (advanced maternal age, passive smoking, underweight, no folic acid used, and low education) and non-GDM (advanced maternal age, alcohol intake, underweight, no folic acid used, and low education) pregnancies. It was found that 18.4% and 33.4% of LBW cases could be theoretically prevented through these five identified risk factors in both GDM and non-GDM cohorts, respectively. Among four shared contributors, low education emerged as the primary modifiable risk factor (adjusted PAF:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 34,031 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free