Evidence Hub

Urinary Biomarkers and Respiratory Responses to Indoor and Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Urban Children: A Prospective Cohort Study

Dung T. Phung, H. Le, P. Thai, N. Nguyen, Ngoc Dang Tran, Ngoc Huynh, Lệ Linh Trần, N. Nguyen et al.

Global Environmental Science, 2026

53 participants

Abstract

COVID-19 lockdowns unintentionally improved air quality by reducing traffic and industrial activity. This study assessed changes in respiratory health and urinary biomarkers of air pollution exposure among children with no traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) exposure and TRAP re-exposure under COVID-19-related lockdowns. A prospective cohort study was conducted with 53 children from urban districts in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Two time measurements were taken: t0 (immediately post-lockdown, no TRAP exposure) and t1 (six months after TRAP re-exposure). The children underwent physical examinations, respiratory tests (spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)), and urine collection for 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) and malondialdehyde (MDA) analysis. Overall, thirty-five children were eligible for the analysis. FeNO and lung function parameters (SVC, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC) showed significant changes after TRAP re-exposure. Following the return to normal daily activities after the COVID-19 pandemic, children exposed to passive smoking exhibited lower 1-OHP levels, which may be attributable to increased time spent outdoors. Significant increases in FeNO were observed in children exposed to passive smoke (p = 0.007), incense smoke (p = 0.003), and gas cooking (p = 0.003). The respiratory function values (SVC, FVC, and FEV1) of children underwent significant increases (p < 0.05) after the lockdown was eased and their exposure to indoor pollution was reduced while being…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 53 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free