Evidence Hub

Cross-sectional associations of gender identity and sexual orientation, with co-occurrence and clustering of health-related behaviours among British adolescents: Millennium cohort study

L. Ricardo, Andrea D. Smith, Kathryn R. Hesketh, Y. Chavez-Ugalde, Eun-Young Lee, E. V. van Sluijs

Preventive Medicine, 2024

6,022 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

We examined whether gender identity and sexual orientation were associated with seven health-related behaviours, and with co-occurrence and clustering of these behaviours among British adolescents.

METHODS

Millennium Cohort Study (age 17 wave) provided data on the exposures, gender identity (male, female, genderqueer) and sexual orientation (heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian, or other), and seven self-reported health-related behaviours (binge drinking, drug use, no consumption of breakfast, no consumption of fruits or vegetables, physical inactivity, poor sleep, and smoking or vaping). Poisson regressions examined associations between the exposures and single behaviours (reporting prevalence ratios (PRs)); and multinomial logistic regressions were used for behavioural cumulative co-occurrence score (reporting PRs). Cluster patterns were identified using Ward's agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis while associations with cluster membership were performed using logistic regressions (reporting odds ratios (ORs)).

RESULTS

Our sample included 6022 adolescents (55.4% female, 1.5% genderqueer, 11.6% non-heterosexual). Adolescents who identified as genderqueer had the highest prevalence of not eating breakfast (PR: 60.5% [95%CI 48.4-71.4]) and poor sleep (68.7% [95%CI 55.6-79.3]). Those who identified as bisexual had a higher PR of co-occurring behaviours (2.46 [95%CI 1.39-4.27]). Among the three clusters identified (1: Multiple risk behaviours; 2: Physical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,022 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free