Evidence Hub

Association between the Fatty Liver Index (FLI) and incident coronary heart disease: insights from a cohort study on the Chinese population

Ying Miao, Yu Wang, Pi-Jun Yan, Yi Li, Zhuang Chen, Nan-Wei Tong, Qin Wan

Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2024

8,647 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background The debate persists regarding whether metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) actively contributes to coronary heart disease or merely acts as a passive indicator. Objective This research aims to clarify the relationship between liver fat accumulation, as quantified by FLI, and the risk of developing coronary heart disease. Methods Conducted from April to November 2011, the REACTION project, spearheaded by the Endocrinology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, focused on Chinese adults aged 40 and above. Comprehensive data collection employed both questionnaires and specialized medical equipment, covering physical measurements, blood pressure, and pertinent biochemical markers. The study population excluded those with pre-existing coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. Based on the initial data, participants were segmented and grouped into three categories. Analytically, the study utilized Cox proportional hazards models, further enhanced by stratified analyses to identify variations within predefined demographic groups. Results In this study, we enrolled 8,647 participants, comprising 2,887 males and 5,760 females. Over the 10-year non-interventional follow-up period, 433 participants (5%) passed away due to various reasons, with 55 deaths attributed to coronary heart disease/myocardial infarction, accounting for 12.7% of total deaths. Additionally, 484 participants were diagnosed with new-onset coronary heart…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 8,647 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free