Evidence Hub

Distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns of urinary pathogens in preoperative midstream urine cultures from Chinese patients with urinary calculi: a meta-analysis

Mei X, Zhang S, Xu P, He Z, Tang R, Yang B, Sarfaraz IM, Wu W

BMC urology, 2024

6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study comprehensively evaluates the distribution patterns and antimicrobial resistance profiles of urinary pathogens in Preoperative midstream urine cultures collected from patients with urinary calculi in China over the last two decades.

METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 41 studies was conducted. A systematic search across various databases, including Wanfang Data, CNKI, SinoMed, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, was carried out, covering the time period from 2002 to 2022. Using R 4.2.1 software, a meta-analysis was performed to assess heterogeneity using Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistic.

RESULTS: In the analysis of preoperative midstream urine cultures from Chinese patients with urinary calculi, gram-negative bacteria dominated at 69%, with Escherichia coli (43%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (8%), Proteus mirabilis (6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5%), Acinetobacter baumannii (3%), and Enterobacter cloacae (4%) being prominent. Gram-positive organisms included Enterococcus faecalis (9%), Enterococcus faecium (5%), and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). Over time, proportions of Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus aureus decreased, while Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa increased. Notably, Escherichia coli proportion reduced from 37 to 33% within the last two decades. Antimicrobial resistance analysis indicated declining resistance in E. coli (e.g., co-trimoxazole from 73 to 55%, gentamicin from 64 to 40%),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free