Evidence Hub

Association of active and passive smoking with noncommunicable diseases in a large health check-up population: A cross-sectional study in Changzhi, Shanxi province, China

Zhiyong Dou, Ping Wu, Lu-Jie Wang, Jing-Hui Guo

Tobacco Induced Diseases, 2026

38,906 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Tobacco smoke, encompassing both active smoking and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, constitutes a leading modifiable risk factor for the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This study aimed to examine the association of active smoking and SHS with the presence of NCDs among health check-up populations, and to explore the dose-response association according to daily cigarette consumption and smoking duration. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among 38906 adults aged ≥18 years who were local residents undergoing physical examination in Changzhi, Shanxi Province from January to December 2025. Questionnaire interviews were used to capture the demographics, lifestyle habits, tobacco smoke status (active smoking, SHS exposure, daily cigarette consumption, and smoking duration), and clinically diagnosed NCDs. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with adjustment for potential confounders. In this study, a p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS The overall prevalence of current smoking was 27.3% (51.3% in men, 0.3% in women), and 26.2% of participants had at least one NCD. After full adjustment, active smoking remained independently associated with increased odds of NCDs (AOR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.18–1.35). A modest dose-response gradient was observed for smoking duration: compared with <5 years, the AORs were 1.24 (95% CI: 1.08–1.43) for 5–14 years, 1.23…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 38,906 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free