Evidence Hub

Association between smoking status and vitamin B12 levels in Jordanian adults: A cross-sectional study of active, passive, and non-smokers

A. Salem, Fanar Alsmarat, L. Al-Zerikat, Wiam M. Al-Sharaa, Tasneem Al-Awaida, Layth Al-ramahi, Yousef Shawawrah, Maryam H. Al-Husari

Journal of Public Health Research, 2026

251 participants

Abstract

This cross-sectional study investigated the association between smoking status and serum vitamin B12 concentrations in a Jordanian adult population, using plasma cotinine as a validated biomarker of tobacco exposure. Tobacco use remains a major public health concern in Jordan, where smoking prevalence is among the highest globally. Although previous studies have explored the link between smoking and vitamin B12 status, findings have been inconsistent, and the effects of passive smoke exposure are not well understood. A total of 251 Jordanian adults from Amman and Madaba governorates were categorized as active smokers (n=125), passive smokers (n=63), or non-smokers (n=63). Non-parametric tests (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U) were used to compare group differences, and multiple linear regression was performed on log-transformed vitamin B12 concentrations to identify independent predictors. Vitamin B12 levels differed significantly across groups (p=0.021), with passive smokers showing the highest median concentrations (373.0 pg/mL) compared with active smokers (327.0 pg/mL) and non-smokers (295.0 pg/mL). In the regression model, passive smoking was independently associated with higher vitamin B12 concentrations (B=0.168, p = 0.027), while higher BMI was associated with lower concentrations (B=−0.011, p = 0.039). No significant correlation was observed between cotinine and vitamin B12 levels within any group. These findings suggest a possible compensatory metabolic response…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 251 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free