Evidence Hub

Prevalence and risk factors of antinuclear antibodies among pregnant women: A cross-sectional study in Qingdao, China

Shan Kang, Jiahong Chen, Mingzhen Cuo, Gui-Liang Hao, Shuai Wang, Meng-Lu Wu, Tao Wei, Jin-Lian Song

Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2025

3,711 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and specific patterns of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and to identify potential risk factors among Chinese pregnant women.

METHODS

ANAs were detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method using HEp-2 cell antigen. The magnetic bar code immunofluorescent luminescence method was used to detect specific ANAs. Socio-demographic information, lifestyle elements and other data were obtained in the Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital from a questionnaire-based interviews.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2159 Chinese pregnant women in their first trimester of pregnancy. The ANAs prevalence was 14.7 %. The most common antibody titer was 1:100 (n=241, 11.2 %), followed by 1:320 (n=55, 2.5 %) and >1:320 (n=22, 1.0 %). The most common staining pattern was nuclear speckled type (n=95, 30.0 %), followed by nuclear dense fine speckled (n=82, 25.8 %), cytoplasmic (n=39, 12.3 %), homogeneous (n=30, 9.4 %) and nucleolar (n=19, 6.0 %).The common specific ANAs included SSA (n=37,11.6 %), Ro52 (n=33,10.3 %), AMA-M2(n=16, 5.0 %),and SSB (n=20, 6.3 %),etc. Passive smoking, age at 30-34 years, multiparity, pre-pregnancy thyroid diseases and hypertension significantly increased the probability of ANA positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

ANAs were present in 14.7 % of Chinese women during their first trimester of pregnancy. Passive smoking, multiparity, pre-pregnancy thyroid diseases, and hypertension were significantly associated with ANA positivity.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 3,711 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free