Evidence Hub

Patterns of Vaping Behavior and Perceived Health Risks Among Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

O. Martín-Santiago, B. Arribas-Simón, M. Calvo-Valcárcel, P. Martinez.Gimeno, M. Ríos-Vaquero

European psychiatry, 2026

230 participants

Abstract

Introduction Vaping has gained popularity since its introduction in 2005, particularly among adolescents and young adults, due to its appealing flavors and perceived lower health risks compared to traditional smoking. Despite its widespread use, emerging evidence suggests that vaping may pose significant health risks, including respiratory and cardiovascular damage, and potential neurological effects. Objectives This study aimed to explore the demographic and behavioral characteristics of individuals who vape, assess the perceived health risks associated with vaping, and examine the relationship between vaping and conventional tobacco use. Methods A cross-sectional exploratory design was employed. A non-probabilistic convenience sample of 230 individuals aged 18–40 was recruited via social media. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing vaping habits, substance types used, motivations, perceived risks, and tobacco use history. Results Of the 230 participants, 97 (42.2%) reported having vaped at least once. Among them, 66.0% no longer vape, while 5.2% vape daily, 6.2% occasionally, and 22.7% sporadically. The primary motivations for initiating vaping were curiosity (60.8%) and social influence (15.5%), with fewer citing smoking cessation (11.3%) or stress reduction (2.1%). A significant proportion (62.9%) perceived vaping as equally harmful as smoking, and 80.4% reported quitting due to health concerns. A positive correlation was found between risk perception and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 230 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free