Evidence Hub

E-Cigarette or Vaping Product Use–Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) mimicking chronic interstitial lung disease in a young adult: a case report

Elif Karabacak Mutlu, M. Meşe, Cansu Yıldız, Kadir Kolçak, E. Bozkurtlar, O. Demircioglu, Mustafa Erdoğan, U. Kasapoğlu et al.

Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, 2026

Abstract

E-cigarette or vaping product use–associated lung injury may show variable clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic patterns. Although it usually presents as acute or subacute lung injury, chronic or atypical forms may mimic interstitial lung disease and lead to diagnostic delay. This case highlights an uncommon interstitial lung disease–like presentation of vaping-associated lung injury in a young adult. A 32-year-old man presented with progressive exertional dyspnea and worsening radiologic abnormalities despite previous treatment for presumed interstitial lung disease. The patient remained under a presumed chronic ILD diagnosis for almost two years before detailed reassessment of the exposure history and re-evaluation of the lung biopsy prompted diagnostic reconsideration. Serial thoracic computed tomography showed progressive bilateral ground-glass opacities and interstitial changes. Reassessment of exposure history revealed daily e-cigarette use, particularly during periods of symptom worsening. Re-evaluation of the prior surgical lung biopsy demonstrated a macrophage-predominant smoking-related injury pattern with desquamative interstitial pneumonia–like features and no typical findings of usual interstitial pneumonia or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Based on an integrated assessment of the clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and exposure findings, e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury was considered the most likely diagnosis. After cessation of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free