Evidence Hub

Chronic Cough With Reduced Diffusing Capacity and Preserved-Ratio Impaired Spirometry in a Young Never-Smoker With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Diagnostic Pitfall

Nivedita Singh, Divya Makkar, Govind Kumar, Vachan K Vanjarapu, Soujanya Sodavarapu

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

Chronic cough in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus can be difficult to evaluate, especially when initial testing is unrevealing. We report the case of a 33-year-old woman with long-standing systemic lupus erythematosus, biopsy-proven lupus nephritis, prior extrapulmonary pericardial tuberculosis, and no active or passive smoking exposure who developed a persistent dry cough for six months. She was initially treated for gastroesophageal reflux disease with pantoprazole, without meaningful relief. Chest radiography and swallowing assessment were normal. Initial pulmonary function testing in July 2023 was formally interpreted as moderate obstructive airways disease, mild parenchymal restriction, and a moderately severe diffusion defect, without a significant bronchodilator response. High-resolution volumetric computed tomography of the chest with dynamic airway assessment showed no emphysema, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, tracheomalacia, or acute cardiopulmonary process. Her cough improved substantially after inhaled therapy with albuterol and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate. Repeat pulmonary function testing in October 2023 showed improved spirometric values, but the forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio remained preserved, and hemoglobin-adjusted diffusing capacity remained reduced at 64% predicted. This case highlights a diagnostic pitfall: inhaler-responsive chronic cough and a pulmonary function report…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free