Evidence Hub

Local radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer sustainably boosts the clinical benefit of first-line immunotherapy: a case report

Hongming Wang, Nuoni Wang, Shiyan Li, Yang-Feng Du, Tao Wu, Wei Tian, Wen Dong, Xiaoyang Liu et al.

Frontiers in Immunology, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Background Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has a dismal prognosis owing to its high aggressiveness, rapid drug resistance, and early metastasis. ES-SCLC responds well to first-line chemotherapy, and chemotherapy coupled with immunotherapy can further improve overall survival. However, the long-term survival of patients remains unsatisfactory because of its high recurrence rate and the poor efficacy of second-line treatment. Although local radiotherapy is an important component of the overall treatment for ES-SCLC, its value in the age of immunotherapy remains controversial. Case description A 54-year-old male with ES-SCLC achieved a complete response (CR), as determined using enhanced computed tomography (CT) after four cycles of immunochemotherapy (serplulimab, carboplatin, and etoposide). Whole-body positron emission tomography-CT was performed during maintenance treatment with serplulimab, which showed primary lung, liver, and bone metastatic lesions with CR. However, several mediastinal lymph nodes exhibited glucose metabolism uptake, and new lesions appeared on the head. The patient underwent palliative radiotherapy of the head and consolidative thoracic radiotherapy of the chest and continued maintenance treatment with serplulimab. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging of the head suggested good control of metastatic lesions (CR). The patient received first-line immunotherapy for approximately 20 months. Conclusions This report presents a patient with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free