Evidence Hub

Drosophila melanogaster as an Alternative Model to Higher Organisms for In Vivo Lung Research

Ehrhardt B, Roeder T, Krauss-Etschmann S

International journal of molecular sciences, 2024

800 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

COPD and asthma are lung diseases that cause considerable burden to more than 800 million people worldwide. As both lung diseases are so far incurable, it is mandatory to understand the mechanisms underlying disease development and progression for developing novel therapeutic approaches. Exposures to environmental cues such as cigarette smoke in earliest life are known to increase disease risks in the individual's own future. To explore the pathomechanisms leading to later airway disease, mammalian models are instrumental. However, such in vivo experiments are time-consuming and burdensome for the animals, which applies in particular to transgenerational studies. Along this line, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster comes with several advantages for research in this field. The short lifespan facilitates transgenerational studies. A high number of evolutionary conserved signaling pathways, together with a large toolbox for tissue-specific gene modification, has the potential to identify novel target genes involved in disease development. A well-defined airway microbiome could help to untangle interactions between disease development and microbiome composition. In the following article, Drosophila melanogaster is therefore presented and discussed as an alternative in vivo model to investigate airway diseases that can complement and/or replace models in higher organisms.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 800 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free