Evidence Hub

Association between electronic cigarette use and prediabetes, diabetes, and insulin resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Davide Campagna, Antonio Ceriello, Anas Ali Alhur, Najim Zafer Alshahrani, Anoop Misra, Abdul Basit, Cristina Russo et al.

Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has grown rapidly worldwide, yet metabolic health consequences, particularly glycaemic outcomes, remain poorly understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesises the available epidemiological evidence on the association between e-cigarette use and diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, and insulin resistance. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Embase from inception through December 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting effect estimates for the association between e-cigarette use and diabetes, prediabetes, or insulin resistance in adult populations were eligible. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, stratified by outcome and exposure category (current exclusive e-cigarette users, dual users, and former e-cigarette users versus never users). Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics and Cochran’s Q test. Ten studies (9 cross-sectional, 1 prospective cohort; combined participants exceeding 2.8 million) met inclusion criteria; 8 cross-sectional studies contributed to quantitative pooling, while one cross-sectional study and the prospective cohort were narratively synthesised. For prediabetes, pooled ORs versus never users were 1.34 (95% CI 1.01–1.77; I 2 = 74.2%) for current exclusive users, 1.26 (1.06–1.49; I 2 = 75.4%) for dual users, and 1.13 (1.06–1.20; I 2 = 0%) for former users. For diabetes, only dual users showed a significant elevation (OR 1.23; 1.01–1.49; I 2 =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free