Evidence Hub

Comparative effects of electronic cigarettes and dual use of electronic and conventional cigarettes on adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kanokporn Sukhato, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Natasha Chawla, Suparee Wisawapipat Boonmanunt, Amarit Tansawet, Prapaporn Pornsuriyasak, Patcharanat Inpithuk, Gareth J. McKay et al.

BMC Public Health, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) use and dual-use of E-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes (C-cigarettes) during pregnancy on adverse pregnancy outcomes, compared to C-cigarette use and non-use. METHODS: A two-step search was conducted: first, systematic reviews (SRs) on the effects of E-cigarette use during pregnancy were identified from Medline and Scopus up to November 7, 2023; second, an updated search from the last search of previous SRs to May 30, 2025, was performed to capture additional relevant studies. Eligible studies included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of E-cigarette or dual-use on adverse pregnancy outcomes, with non-use or C-cigarette use as comparators. A two-stage network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of E-cigarette use, dual-use, and non-use. RESULTS: Twelve studies (eleven observational and one RCT) were included. E-cigarette use was significantly associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 2.51) and lower mean birth weight (mean difference = -57 g; 95% CI: -105 to -9) compared to non-use. However, the risks of small for gestational age (SGA), miscarriage, and mean gestational age at delivery in E-cigarette users did not differ from those in non-users. Dual use of E-cigarettes and C-cigarettes was significantly associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free