Evidence Hub

Tuberculosis-associated respiratory impairment and disability in children and adolescents: a systematic review

Kamila Romanowski, Silvia S. Chiang, Sierra A. Land, Marieke M. van der Zalm, Jonathon R. Campbell

EClinicalMedicine, 2025

14 citations

Abstract

Background: While the immediate effects of pulmonary tuberculosis are well-documented, respiratory impacts persisting beyond treatment, particularly in children and adolescents, are less understood. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence on tuberculosis-associated respiratory impairment and disability in children and adolescents following tuberculosis treatment. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus, and preprints from January 1, 2004, to December 5, 2024, to identify studies enrolling children (0-9 years old) or adolescents (10-19 years old) who completed treatment for microbiologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis. Eligible studies measured at least one tuberculosis-associated respiratory impairment or disability outcome. Data were analyzed descriptively and stratified into three age groups based on median age of tuberculosis diagnosis: 10 years. This study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42024529906). Findings: We identified 117 studies reporting tuberculosis-associated respiratory impairment or disability outcomes. Of those, five met our inclusion criteria, as over 80% of the identified studies excluded children and adolescents. Following tuberculosis treatment, children and adolescents exhibited significant respiratory impairments. In children 10 years. Disability was frequently reported, with 35-50% of children and adolescents experiencing respiratory symptoms and children <10…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free