Evidence Hub

Exploring the influence of user‐generated content on alcohol‐related attitudes and behaviours among young people: A systematic review

Alessandro Crocetti, Nichole Lister (Wonnarua), Jennifer Browne, Florentine Petronella Martino, Kathryn Backholer, Benjamin C. Riordan, Peter Graeme Miller, Matthew Dunn

Addiction, 2026

44 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Alcohol-related content on social media, particularly user-generated content (UGC), is an increasingly normal feature of young people's digital lives and has been linked to increased alcohol use; however, a critical gap remains in understanding how different subgroups of young people are exposed to and engage with such content, and how this may be associated with their alcohol-related attitudes and behaviours. This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence on the association between alcohol-related UGC and young people's alcohol-related attitudes and behaviours, and to describe patterns of exposure and engagement within subgroups of adolescents and young adults. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in September 2023 and again in February 2026 across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, EMBASE and CINAHL. Eligible peer-reviewed quantitative (cross-sectional and longitudinal), qualitative and mixed-methods studies described alcohol-related UGC (including influencer content); explored social media use; examined associations with alcohol-related attitudes, behaviours or harms; and focused on adolescents or young adults. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and quality assessment was conducted. RESULTS: Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria (24 cross-sectional, 14 longitudinal, seven qualitative, one mixed methods), with quantitative studies including 44 219 participants. Overall study…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free