Evidence Hub

Risk Factors for Severe Bronchiolitis in Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand Infants: A Systematic Review

Kate Loveys, Meredith Louise Borland, Ed A Oakley, Franz E Babl, Elizabeth Cotterell, Libby Haskell, Sharon O’Brien, Catherine L. Wilson et al.

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2025

895 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

AIM: Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospital admission in Australasian infants. Infants with risk factors for severe disease may have a greater likelihood of prolonged hospitalisation and intensive care admission. This study aimed to synthesise the literature on risk factors for severe bronchiolitis in Australasian infants. METHODS: Systematic review including observational studies of risk factors for severe bronchiolitis in Australasian infants (< 12 months), published from 2000. Databases were searched (24 January 2024): MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and CINAHL. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies, and evidence quality was evaluated using GRADE. Results were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: Ten out of 26 467 articles were included (N = 895 276; 12 cohorts, prospective = 5, retrospective = 7). Studies were mostly rated low RoB. There was evidence for the following risk factors: younger chronological age, prematurity, plural birth, comorbidity (chronic lung disease, congenital heart disease, chronic neurological disease, any genetic disorder, any comorbidity), Indigenous ethnicity, economic disadvantage, tobacco smoke exposure and timing of illness onset at presentation. Most risk factors had moderate-quality evidence (range high to very low). Evidence was lacking for the following risk factors present in international literature: breastfeeding exposure and faltering growth. The following risk factors have…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 895 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free