Evidence Hub

Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure and neurological impairment at 10 years of age among children born extremely preterm: a prospective cohort

TM O¿Shea, JA Frazier, RM Joseph, Fry, RC, RN Fichorova, LM Douglass, Alan Edward Leviton, Hudson Pires de Oliveira Santos Junior et al.

Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), 2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between prenatal tobacco smoke exposure and neurological impairment at 10Â years of age among children born extremely preterm (<28Â weeks of gestation). DESIGN: The Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn (ELGAN) Study, a prospective cohort. SETTING: Ten-year follow-up of extremely preterm infants born at 14 US hospitals between 2002 and 2004. METHODS: Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure was defined as a mother's report at enrolment of active (i.e. maternal) and passive smoking during pregnancy. Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations was used. Models adjusted for mother's age, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, pre-pregnancy body mass index, US region, multiple gestation and infant's sex; and in sensitivity analysis, gestational age at delivery and clinical subtype of preterm birth, given their classification as intermediate and non-confounding variables. MAIN OUTCOMES: Neurological impairment at 10Â years, epilepsy, cerebral palsy and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Of 1200 ELGAN study survivors, 856 were assessed at 10Â years of age with neurological outcomes, of whom 14% (118/856) had active tobacco exposure during pregnancy and 24% (207/852) had passive tobacco exposure. Compared with children who were not exposed prenatally to tobacco, children exposed to active tobacco use during pregnancy had a higher risk of epilepsy (14% versus 5%; adjusted relative risk: 1.68, 95% CI 1.45-1.92). This risk remained after…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free