Evidence Hub

Longitudinal Changes in Corneal Epithelial and Central Corneal Thickness in Type 2 Diabetes Assessed by AS-OCT: A Real-World Study

Boyacı İ, Demirci G

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026

40 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate longitudinal changes in central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET) and central corneal thickness (CCT) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) over 12 months in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving one of two routinely prescribed oral antidiabetic regimens, and to explore their association with glycemic changes.

METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, 40 adults with type 2 diabetes receiving one of two routinely prescribed treatment regimens (vildagliptin-metformin, n=19; empagliflozin-metformin, n=21) underwent AS-OCT at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Glycated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose were assessed at each visit. Precision analysis indicated detectable between-group differences of 4.7 µm for CCT and 6.1 µm for CCET.

RESULTS: Both groups showed significant within-group glycated hemoglobin improvement (mean reduction: -2.28% and -2.88% in the vildagliptin-metformin and empagliflozin-metformin groups, respectively; p<0.05) without between-group differences. CCT and CCET showed no statistically detectable longitudinal change over 12 months, with no significant differences in longitudinal change between groups. Glycated hemoglobin change showed a modest independent association with CCT change (β = 0.81 µm per 1% glycated hemoglobin; 95% CI 0.20-1.42; p=0.011; n=32).

CONCLUSIONS: Corneal structural parameters showed no statistically detectable longitudinal change or between-group difference over 12…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free