Evidence Hub

GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and their combination: effects on carotid atherosclerosis regression, oxidative stress, and amyloid-β1-40 in diabetes

Ikonomidis I, Papageorgiou A, Pavlidis G, Georgiopoulos G, Katogiannis K, Maratou E, Thymis J, Pliouta L et al.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), amyloid-β1-40 (Aβ1-40), and oxidative stress are markers of vascular aging and cardiovascular risk. We compared the effects of insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), and their combination on the aforementioned markers in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We prospectively studied 183 metformin-treated T2DM patients, propensity-score-matched to 12-mo treatment with insulin, liraglutide, empagliflozin, or liraglutide plus empagliflozin. Six-segment cIMT and plaque-equivalent lesions (cIMT ≥ 1.5 mm) were assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 mo; plasma Aβ1-40 and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured. All regimens were associated with reductions in cIMT and Aβ1-40 at 12 mo (P P P P P = 0.028). Liraglutide, empagliflozin, and their combination induced greater reduction of cIMT (-8.2, -5.6, and -10.7% vs. -1.7%) and Aβ1-40 (-52.1, -40.3, and -50.7% vs. -30.7%; P P NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated the effect of insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), and their combination on carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and amyloid-β1-40 (Aβ1-40) in diabetes. Twelve-month treatment with GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, and their combination confers significant reductions in cIMT and Aβ1-40 compared with insulin. cIMT regression was associated with Aβ1-40 and malondialdehyde reductions. Our findings support that newer antidiabetic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free