Evidence Hub

Model-Informed Approaches for Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Evidence Generation: Insights from a Model-Based Longitudinal HbA1c Meta-Analysis from EMA Marketing Authorization Applications

Colin PJ, Manolis E, Koomen JV

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026

809 participants

Abstract

Evidence generation for antihyperglycemic therapies in pediatric type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains challenging, with most randomized trials failing to demonstrate statistically significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), partly due to substantial between-subject variability. To better understand the sources and implications of this variability, we conducted a model-based longitudinal meta-analysis of individual participant data from seven pediatric T2DM clinical trials submitted to the European Medicines Agency in support of marketing authorization applications. The analysis incorporated 3295 HbA1c observations from 809 participants and quantified the contributions of baseline disease severity, disease progression, placebo response, and treatment effects to longitudinal HbA1c dynamics. Insulin use and longer duration of diabetes were associated with higher baseline HbA1c and/or faster disease progression, while the placebo effect was substantial and highly variable across participants. Clinical trial simulations using the final model demonstrated that trials with fewer than 200 participants are unlikely to achieve 80% power to detect placebo-corrected treatment effects smaller than -0.70%-points over 26 weeks. Enrichment strategies targeting patients with lower variability, as well as model-based estimators-including Bayesian approaches leveraging historical information-substantially reduced the required sample size. These findings indicate that current…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 809 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free