Evidence Hub

A 26-week Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sotagliflozin Compared to Empagliflozin, and Placebo in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP4(i)) With or Without Metformin

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2019

770 participants

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of sotagliflozin versus placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who have inadequate glycemic control on a DPP4(i) with or without metformin.

Conditions: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Primary outcome: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) % at Week 26.

Enrollment: 770 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 770 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free