Evidence Hub

Clinical efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of diabetes kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu L, Liu H, Mao X, Li C, Yan W, Ou Z, Li X

Frontiers in microbiology, 2025

502 participants

Abstract

Objective: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Growing evidence suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis may contribute to DKD progression, and probiotics have been proposed as a potential adjunctive therapy. However, existing clinical findings remain inconsistent, with some trials reporting benefits in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), while others show no significant improvements. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of probiotics in patients with DKD.

Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese Science Citation Database up to October 2025. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 1.0 (RoB 1.0), publication bias was evaluated with Egger's test, and the certainty of evidence was graded according to the GRADE approach.

Results: Seven RCTs involving 502 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that probiotics significantly reduced serum creatinine [mean difference (MD) -0.09 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.14 to -0.04], BUN (MD -1.58 mg/dL, 95% CI -2.80 to -0.36), fasting blood glucose (MD -0.48 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.07), triglycerides (MD -19.17 mg/dL, 95% CI -35.14 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 502 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free