Evidence Hub

Once-weekly semaglutide versus placebo for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in Denmark: A long-term cost-effectiveness analysis based on FLOW

Rossing P, Lindhardt M, Tikkanen CK, Menon J, Cattin J, Hunt B, Malkin SJP, Chubb B et al.

Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Background: The FLOW clinical trial recently demonstrated that the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with kidney- and cardio-protective effects (the latter already shown in the SUSTAIN 6 trial) compared with placebo, both in addition to standard of care (SoC), in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study assessed the long-term cost-effectiveness of semaglutide versus placebo in people with T2D and CKD in Denmark, based on outcomes from FLOW.

Methods: Life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications, and costs were projected over a lifetime time horizon using the PRIME T2D Model. Baseline cohort characteristics and changes in risk factors with semaglutide and placebo were taken from FLOW, with extrapolation over patient lifetimes. Outcomes were assessed for the full population and subgroups receiving/not receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors at baseline. Quality-of-life disutilities and Denmark-specific costs (expressed in 2023 Danish Kroner [DKK]) were applied to capture the impact of diabetes-related complications and pharmacy costs.

Results: Treatment with semaglutide was projected to improve long-term quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.60 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with placebo in the full population and by 0.44 and 0.62 QALYs in subgroups receiving/not receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors at…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free