Evidence Hub

Angiotensin profiles in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes with combination therapy of empagliflozin and linagliptin versus metformin and insulin glargine

A. Bosch, M. Poglitsch, D. Kannenkeril, C. Ott, R. Pietschner, K. Striepe, M. Schiffer, R. Schmieder

Journal of Hypertension, 2022

55 participants

Abstract

Objective: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a key role in the physiological regulation of blood pressure. Patients with type-2-diabetes-mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension are known to have increased RAS activity. However, the precise role of RAS activation after SGLT2-inhibitor therapy is unknown. The classic RAS comprises the ACE-AngII-AT1R-axis (classic-axis) that promotes vasoconstriction. The Angiotensin-converting-enzyme-2-angiotensin-(1–7)-Mas axis (Mas-axis) with its components Angiotensin-(1–7) (Ang-1–7) and Angiotensin-(1–5) (Ang-1–5) is an endogenous negative regulatory pathway of the classic-axis, which can reduce its harmful effects. Design and method: Angiotensin profiles were determined in 55 patients with hypertension and T2DM from our double blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial “Effects of Empagliflozin+Linagliptin (E+L) vs Metformin+Insulin Glargine (M+I) on Renal and Vascular Changes in Type 2 Diabetes’’ (ELMI) at baseline and three months after application of either E+L or M+I. An LC-MS/MS based approach was used to simultaneously quantify individual angiotensin metabolites (Attoquant Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria). Results: In the E+L group medication induced a rise in Ang-I, Ang-(1–7) and a trend to a rise in Ang-II between baseline and treatment, which was not present in the M+I group (table). Comparison between the E+L and M+I group revealed that change between baseline and treatment was significantly different for Ang I (p =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 55 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free