Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Nefecon in Patients with IgA Nephropathy from Mainland China: 2-Year NefIgArd Trial Results

Zhang H, Lafayette R, Wang B, Ying L, Zhu Z, Stone A, Kristensen J, Barratt J

Kidney360, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Background: IgA nephropathy (IgAN), an immune-mediated kidney disease, is particularly prevalent among individuals of East Asian ancestry. Nefecon is a novel, oral, targeted-release budesonide formulation designed to inhibit galactose-deficient IgA1 formation underlying IgAN pathophysiology. We present findings in patients with IgAN from mainland China participating in the 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 NefIgArd trial of nefecon.

Methods: Patients (aged 18 years and older) with primary IgAN (eGFR 35–90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, persistent proteinuria [urine protein–creatinine ratio ≥0.8 g/g or proteinuria ≥1 g/24 hours] despite optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade) received nefecon or placebo over 9 months, followed by a 15-month follow-up phase on supportive care alone. The primary efficacy end point was time-weighted average of eGFR over 2 years.

Results: Sixty-two patients from mainland China were included in this prespecified analysis. The primary efficacy end point was 9.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 19.8) in favor of nefecon versus placebo. This was consistent with (and numerically greater than) that of the global study population. Time to confirmed 30% eGFR reduction or kidney failure from baseline was substantially delayed with nefecon (patients with an event: 9%) versus placebo (30%; hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.73). No deaths were reported in the China cohort. In the nefecon group,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free