Evidence Hub

Myoprotective Fat-Loss Phenotypes in Obesity-Associated Type 2 Diabetes: A 12-Month Real-World Cohort Study of Metformin-Based Treatment Regimens

Bujdei-Tebeică I, Pantea-Stoian AM, Mihai DA, Ștefan SD, Serafinceanu C

Clinics and practice, 2026

166 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In obesity-associated type 2 diabetes (T2DM), therapeutic benefit increasingly requires assessment of not only HbA1c and total body weight, but also the composition and functional quality of weight change. We evaluated a myoprotective fat-loss phenotype, defined as a reduction in adiposity accompanied by preservation of lean mass and handgrip strength. Methods: This secondary patient-level analysis included 166 adults with T2DM who completed 12 months of follow-up without changing treatment in a real-world tertiary diabetes cohort. Patients received metformin alone or metformin combined with a sulfonylurea, a DPP-4 inhibitor, an SGLT2 inhibitor, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, or insulin. Body composition was assessed by bioimpedance and muscle function by handgrip dynamometry. The primary phenotype required a reduction in fat mass ≥5%, a loss of lean mass Results: Fat-mass reduction ≥5% occurred in 58/166 patients (34.9%), lean-mass preservation in 129/166 (77.7%), and handgrip preservation in 143/166 (86.1%). The complete myoprotective phenotype was present in 35/166 patients (21.1%) and differed significantly across treatment groups (χ2 = 131.58; permutation p Conclusions: Myoprotective fat-loss phenotypes can be identified in obesity-associated T2DM using body composition and handgrip measures. These observational findings support the assessment of the quality, not just the magnitude, of weight loss in diabetes care and require validation in larger…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 166 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free