Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose dapagliflozin-pioglitazone in Indian adults with type 2 diabetes: a phase 3 PRO-1 trial

Singh AK, Seshadri KG, Unnikrishnan AG, Kesavadev J, Kalra S, Joshi SR, Pandit K, Sahay RK et al.

Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2026

180 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin and pioglitazone versus a loose combination (LC) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus inadequately controlled on earlier metformin containing mono therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 12-week PRO-1 study was a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 trial that enrolled 180 Indian adults with T2DM, Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) > 7.5% to 10% inadequately controlled with metformin. The participants received once-daily FDC (dapagliflozin 10 mg/pioglitazone 15 mg) or equivalent LC therapy (1:1 randomization). The primary endpoint was the HbA1c change (non-inferiority margin, 0.3). The secondary endpoints included fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial glucose (PPG), and HbA1c < 7.5%. RESULTS: At week 12, the least-squares mean HbA1c reduction was − 1.20% (FDC) versus − 1.02% (LC). A between-group difference of − 0.18% (95% CI: −0.56 to 0.20) demonstrated non-inferiority. FPG decreased by − 8.6 mg/dL (FDC) and − 12.0 mg/dL (LC); PPG decreased by − 28.2 mg/dL and − 29.5 mg/dL, respectively. Target HbA1c < 7.5% was achieved in 52.9% (FDC) versus 54.8% (LC) of patients. (mITT population; p = 0.877). Both regimens were generally well tolerated; adverse events were more frequent with the fixed-dose combination than with the loose combination (8.9% versus 1.1%, p = 0.034), but were mild and self-limiting, with no serious events, hypoglycemia, or treatment discontinuation in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 180 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free