Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy of sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors on lipid profiles in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis

Khalil I, Hossain MI, Akter M, Al-Badri SG

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025

805 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global health concern associated with dyslipidemia, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), necessitating effective therapeutic strategies. Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have shown promise in improving metabolic parameters, but their comparative efficacy in NAFLD remains unclear.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 31 December 2024, involving NAFLD patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus placebo or standard treatments. Outcomes included changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, BMI, and HbA1c. A Bayesian NMA was performed using a random-effects model, with mean differences (MD) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) reported. Treatments were ranked using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) scores.

Results: We evaluated and compared the efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors in improving lipid profiles (LDL-C, HDL-C, total cholesterol, and triglycerides), BMI, and HbA1c in patients with NAFLD. Eleven RCTs involving 805 patients were included. Empagliflozin achieved the greatest LDL-C reduction (MD: -8.07 mg/dL, 95% CrI: -25.92 to 1.41; SUCRA: 95.38%), total cholesterol reduction (MD: -15.08 mg/dL, 95% CrI: -58.87 to 5.38; SUCRA: 94.32%), and HbA1c reduction (MD: -0.69%, 95% CrI: -1.52 to -0.06; SUCRA:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 805 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free