Evidence Hub

1152-P: Effect of Initiating Empagliflozin vs. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Health-Care Costs among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

P. Pimple, A. Raju, D. Stafkey-Mailey, S. Shetty

Diabetes, 2020

13,216 participants

Abstract

The 2019 ADA’s Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes recommends use of SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) or GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) as one of the six drug classes after metformin (MET) in T2D patients, and is recommended as the treatment of choice among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD; empagliflozin [EMPA] and liraglutide showing stronger evidence). To understand the economic impact of these recommendations, we evaluated the effect of EMPA vs. GLP-1 RA initiation on all-cause (AC) healthcare costs in patients with T2D. This retrospective cohort study utilized an U.S. commercial claims database to identify patients with T2D who newly initiated EMPA or a GLP-1RA between 08/2014 - 12/2016. First prescription date (index date) for EMPA or a GLP-1RA was used to classify patients into respective cohorts. T2D diagnosis and baseline covariates were assessed during 1-year pre-index period. During a post-index period of up to 1 year, AC costs were computed on a per patient per month (PPPM) basis; and evaluated using generalized linear models that controlled for pre-index covariates. Compared to the GLP-1RA cohort (N = 13,216), patients in the EMPA cohort (N= 3,857) were younger, more likely to be male, and had lower rates of obesity in the 1-year baseline period; all other measured pre-index covariates were similar. After covariate adjustment, the adjusted total AC PPPM cost difference ($1,137 vs. $1,370; difference (Δ) = -$233 PPPM) remained significantly lower for the EMPA…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13,216 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free