Evidence Hub

Abstract 232: Initiating Empagliflozin vs. Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists is Associated With Lower Healthcare Cost of Care Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease

P. Pimple, A. Raju, D. Stafkey-Mailey, S. Shetty

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2020

1,376 participants

Abstract

Background:

The 2019 ADA’s Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes recommend use of SGLT-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) or GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) as one of the six drug classes after metformin (MET) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, and is recommended as the treatment of choice among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD; empagliflozin [EMPA] and liraglutide showing stronger evidence). CVD benefits of empagliflozin and GLP-1 RAs have been demonstrated in clinical trials; however, the impact on all-cause (AC) healthcare costs has not been studied.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study utilized an US based, commercial claims database (IQVIA Pharmetrics Plus) to identify patients with T2D and CVD who initiated empagliflozin or a GLP-1 RA between 08/01/2014 - 12/31/2016. First prescription date (index date) for empagliflozin or a GLP-1 RA was used to classify patients into study cohorts. During a post-index period of up to 1 year, AC costs were computed on a per patient per month (PPPM) basis; and evaluated using generalized linear models that controlled for pre-index covariates. A sub-analysis comparing AC costs among patients who initiated second-line treatment with empagliflozin or a GLP-1 RA after metformin monotherapy, was also conducted.

Results:

As compared to the GLP-1 RA cohort (N = 1376), patients in the empagliflozin cohort (N= 441) were more likely to be males, had a lower Charlson comorbidity score, higher rates of dyslipidemia, and lower rates of obesity in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,376 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free