Evidence Hub

Urogenital Infection Risk Associated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide Target Trial Emulation

Ah YM, Nam J, Youn JW, Yu YM, Kang S

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026

Abstract

Although sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), concerns regarding urogenital infections persist. Therefore, we evaluated the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and genital tract infection (GTI) after SGLT2i initiation in this population. Using nationwide Korean claims data, we emulated a target trial within an active-comparator, new-user cohort design. Adults with T2DM and CKD who initiated SGLT2i or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) between 2016 and 2023 were included. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 41,801 eligible initiators, 6385 initiated SGLT2i and 35,416 initiated DPP-4i. Compared with DPP-4i initiation, SGLT2i initiation was not associated with increased UTI risk (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.17); instead, it was associated with a modestly increased GTI risk (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.58). Severe UTI and GTI requiring hospitalization or emergency department visits did not differ between groups. Moreover, the findings were robust across per-protocol analyses, Fine-Gray competing-risks models, propensity score matching, and alternative outcome definitions. Subgroup and landmark analyses showed no consistent increase in UTI risk, whereas excess GTI risk clustered early and was most pronounced among women aged 65-79 years. Overall, SGLT2i initiation was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free