Evidence Hub

Hidden in the Mediastinum: A Grade 1 Neuroendocrine Tumor Revealed by Refractory Hypokalemia and Ectopic Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH)-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome

Agüero-Pineda SP, Grimaldo-Rivera R, Camacho-Muñoz JA, Martínez-Navarro AT, Landeros-Navarro E, Ramírez-Ochoa S, Zúñiga-García MÁ, Zúñiga-Tamayo DA et al.

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare, fulminant variant of endogenous hypercortisolism that demands rapid localization of the ACTH source to achieve a cure. A 51-year-old woman presented with progressive proximal muscle weakness, centripetal obesity, new-onset hypertension with a blood pressure of 150/90 mmHg at arrival, and persistent hypokalemia (2.2 mmol/L). Biochemical testing confirmed severe hypercortisolism that failed to suppress after an overnight 1-mg dexamethasone test. Plasma ACTH was markedly elevated (798 pg/mL), indicating ACTH-dependent disease. Pituitary MRI showed no adenoma, so an ectopic source was suspected. Contrast-enhanced thoracoabdominal CT revealed a 24 × 14-mm anterior mediastinal node, which was excised via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Histopathology confirmed a grade 1 neuroendocrine tumor with diffuse positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neuron-specific enolase. Twenty-four hours after surgery, serum cortisol decreased to 11.1 µg/dL and ACTH to 2.0 pg/mL; serum potassium normalized without supplementation. Octreotide receptor scintigraphy showed no residual or metastatic disease, and the patient remained normotensive and normokalemic at follow-up. Rapidly progressive hypercortisolism accompanied by refractory hypokalemia should prompt consideration of ectopic ACTH secretion. A stepwise diagnostic approach, including biochemical confirmation, exclusion of pituitary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free