Evidence Hub

GLP-1RA and the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A population-based study

Tesfaye H, Paik JM, Wexler DJ, Hathaway JT, Yu EW, Freedman A, Rizzo JF, Patorno E

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

9 citations

Abstract

Aims: Evidence on the safety of semaglutide and other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) concerning non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is inconclusive, with several studies published to date presenting methodological challenges. We sought to compare the risk of presumed NAION in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), initiating a GLP-1RA versus a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), using a new-user active comparator cohort study design within a target trial emulation framework.

Materials and methods: Using insurance claims data from three databases (01/2016-08/2024), we identified 482 912 propensity score matched (1:1) pairs of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i adult initiators with T2D and without prior ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) or other optic nerve disorders. NAION was defined as a diagnosis of ION without other causes of optic neuropathy, combined with an ophthalmologist or optometrist visit on the same day. We estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and rate differences (RDs).

Results: Over a median follow-up of 6.7 months on treatment, the risk of incident NAION was higher among initiators of GLP-1RA compared with SGLT2i [HR, 1.85; 95% CI (1.51-2.27); RD, 0.29 (0.19, 0.39) per 1000 person-years]. Results were consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. A meta-analysis of our semaglutide analysis with previously published results also showed an elevated risk, with a HR of 2.78 (1.39-5.56).

Conclusions: In this large…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free