Evidence Hub

The efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in patients with adult-onset still's disease: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Jiafen Liao, Q. Tang, Xi Xie, Bing Zhou, Fen Li, Shu Li

International Immunopharmacology, 2024

35 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Janus kinases inhibitors (JAKi) for adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) patients.

METHODS

We searched the Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception up to 22 October 2023. The results were supplemented by a backward search of relevant publications. Two authors independently selected trials. The available studies were comprehensively reviewed and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies with a total of 35 patients were included in the review. Of these patients, 17 (48.6%) patients were treated with tofacitinib, 14 (40%) with baricitinib, 4 (11.4%) with ruxolitinib and 1 (2.9%) with upadacitinib. After treatment with JAKi, 17 (48.6%) patients showed complete remission, 12 (34.3%) patients showed partial remission, and 7 (20%) patients showed loss of efficacy or relapse. The use of ruxolitinib showed a remission rate of 100% in AOSD patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) reported were mild and rare overall. Most AEs were abnormal lipid parameters (9.7%), bacterial pneumonia (3.2%), organised pneumonia (3.2%), diarrhoea (3.2%), increased heart rate (3.2%), menometrorrhagia (3.2%) and leukopenia (3.2%). One patient died from bacterial pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

JAKi therapy may be an option for patients with AOSD, especially for refractory AOSD. For patients with AOSD complicated by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 35 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free