Evidence Hub

Nine‐Year Recurrence‐Free Survival in Gastric Signet‐Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report of Laparoscopic Radical Resection Combining Long‐Term Systematic Therapy and Metformin Enteric‐Coated Tablets

Lingzhi Liao, Guogui Wang, Yi-Fan Li, Dan Zou, Jing Liu, Bin Ma, Jing-Wei Ma, Ya-Li Li et al.

Case Reports in Medicine, 2026

Abstract

Gastric signet‐ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) represents 10%–14% of all gastric malignancies. The overall prognosis for GSRCC is poorer compared to other types of gastric cancer, as it is characterized by a high degree of malignancy, rapid progression, and early metastasis (particularly peritoneal metastasis). Current therapies combining surgery and chemotherapy are challenged by tumor invasiveness, drug resistance, and limited targeted options. Herein, we present the case of a 60‐year‐old male diagnosed with GSRCC who underwent laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Postoperative histopathological analysis confirmed a mixed tumor composition comprising 60% GSRCC and 40% moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Following surgery, the patient was administered adjuvant therapy with oxaliplatin and S‐1 and metformin enteric‐coated tablets for 6 months, followed by 42‐month maintenance therapy regimen combining oral S‐1 and apatinib and metformin enteric‐coated tablets. Over 9 years of follow‐up, the patient demonstrated sustained recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and achieved clinical recovery. This case underscores the potential of individualized adjuvant therapy in addressing the aggressive biological characteristics of GSRCC and offers a valuable reference for strategies to minimize recurrence in GSRCC patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01101438

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free